Showing posts with label bildungsstreik. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bildungsstreik. Show all posts

6.22.2009

Strike snapshots

American-Canadian perspectives on Germany’s educational strike movement, Part II

Braden Goyette and Ali Brunn

The dust has settled from the educational strike’s week of action, and different media organs are already pronouncing their verdicts. But let’s rewind a little bit. We were in Bamberg the day of the main strike, and though the week played out differently all over the Bundesrepublik, some themes and tensions came out in small exchanges throughout the day that are worth re-visiting - particularly the generational antagonisms that emerged, the role that leftist parties played in the strike, and a lot of talk through the megaphone about student fees and relatively little about the structural problems within the system.


Show me the money – generational takes on the students’ demands

Bamberg's medieval market square was filled wall-to-wall with students Wednesday morning, pressed in around the stage in the cobble-stoned space between rows of fruit stands. Signs above the crowd bearing the slogans "Rich parents for all"; "It's too bad my school isn't a bank,” and the recurring chants of “Education for all, and it should be free,” put the issues of tuition and funding center stage as the most prominent rallying points, over the strikers’ many other demands (which include, among other things, greater student representation in the educational system's decision-making bodies, the elimination of the three-tiered secondary school system and the Bachlors/Masters system in its current form).

Many older people present in the square and surrounding streets expressed skepticism about the impetus for the protest. “You all just don’t want to work!” yelled a man in his fifties or sixties to a college student sitting behind a table stacked with literature from leftist parties supporting the strike.

Two other observers, Wolfgang and Therese, who identified themselves as a retiree and homemaker, resented what they saw as the students’ sense of entitlement. Everything the two of them had gotten throughout their lives, Therese said, was earned through hard work and “radical saving.”

“The students are above, you know, and us ordinary folks, we get pushed under.” In her experience, she said, “you’re always hearing about the poor students. The cafes are always full of ‘poor’ students. But when could I ever afford to sit in a cafe and drink coffee? Everything I had, I put towards my children.” She believes that many people feel the same way, she added, particularly in the more rural areas.

A couple who looked about the age to have been part of the 1968 student protest generation had a different take on the situation. “I think it’s great,” Fritz said of the protest, watching the crowd from his bicycle with his five-year-old son on his lap.

“[The three-tiered school system] is obsolete.” Employers, he said, increasingly look for students who have completed an Abitur, the exit exam from the top-tier, university-track high school, the Gymnasium. Students from the Haupt- and Realschule, who earn degrees that should set them on vocational and professional tracks, have a hard time finding employment under these conditions. “It’s nothing new,” he said, though the economic crisis has aggravated the problem.


Where systemic problems figure in

When asked, individual students expressed concern about structural issues, though these didn't figure as prominently in the way the students presented themselves. Few seemed to doubt, for instance, that the three-tiered system is a problem. “Of course it is,” remarked Denise and Andrea, high-schoolers in the 10th and 8th grades, respectively. “Students at the Hauptschule should learn more, they should have better opportunities. But this [strike] won’t accomplish anything,” they concluded, referring to similar actions that hadn’t had an effect the past. The two had nonetheless skipped out of class to catch a glimpse of how the protest was going.

A group called Schule ohne Rassismus was present with a banner at the march to draw attention to the discriminatory character of a system that disproportionately sorts out children from migrant backgrounds, explained Eva Musslein, a member of the group from Bamberg’s Franz-Ludwig-Gymnasium. The group has chapters at 580 schools throughout the country.

For Anna Kathrine, a high-schooler involved in the strike organization, the major issue at stake was equality of opportunity. Students are placed in the different high schools as of the age of 11 or 12, after which point changing tracks is very difficult. “The tests are extremely hard– it almost can’t be done,” she said.

Four girls outside the University of Bamberg gave us their take on the issues with the Bachelors/Masters system, citing increased time pressure caused by the short duration of study in ways that echoed students’ concerns at the FSU in Jena – though they did say that a Bachelor’s from Bamberg would be recognized as equal to one from Munich or other universities. Nonetheless, “we still don’t know how the job market will react to [the Bachelors’], how it will be recognized in comparison to the Diplom, for example,” explained Sophia, who studies English and political science.

Financing their studies came up as an important issue for all of them. “The main issues for me are student fees and the introduction of the Bachelor/Masters system,” said Katharine, a 2nd semester German literature and political science student. Sophia had recently started a side job at a bar where she works Friday nights and weekends, something that’s cut into her quality of life. “But it doesn’t work otherwise – you need to earn money somehow to fund your studies.”


What are the leftists bringing to the party?

An editorial in the University of Bamberg’s student paper framed the strike in grand terms as a generational struggle. We are the generation who’ll have to live with the consequences of this financial crisis, with the consequences of global warming – so the editorial goes – “and no one is really worrying about this generation’s education. Instead, every generation of politicians tries to perpetuate themselves with new reforms, and those sadly remain piecemeal.”

But to what extent is the motivation of the leftist parties supporting the strikers similarly self-serving – particularly in Bavaria, where leftist parties have long had difficulty gaining a foothold?

A marcher waving a flag for Germany’s Left Party, which has its roots in the remains of East Germany’s socialist ruling party, would not say whether the party was providing the strikers with financial support or give her name, though she emphasized that the party was behind the students ideologically.

Anna Katharine, meanwhile, confirmed that the Left Party, the Green Youth, and the socialistic students’ federation were among the groups who’d provided funding for the strikers’ t-shirts, banners, and other materials. Flags from the German Communist Party (KPD) as well as the more mainstream Social Democratic Party (SPD) could be seen waving above the crowd.

There was a good deal of literature produced by the various parties, particularly The Left, specifically for the strike and aimed at young people. An Andy Warhol-esque rendering of Karl Marx graced one pamphlet, while a newsletter put out by Solid, the Left’s youth organization, included articles with titles clearly appealing to the frustrations of high-school aged kids, like “Why school is shit and what we can do about it.”

It’s difficult to determine who might be using whom in this relationship – whether the students were being indoctrinated as a future voting base, or whether the students were being pragmatic and taking all comers when it comes to getting funding.


We’re here, we’re loud, we’re…ambivalent

Watching these strikes as an American can give you a hefty feeling of cognitive dissonance. The three-tiered school system is a totally new concept and is easy to perceive as scandalous, while the university students’ grievances are all about things that would be seen as totally everyday back home – working a side job to pay for school, for instance.

And though the nation-wide action was novel in a sense, we got the feeling that protesting is more like a mechanism of routine maintenance of systems here in Germany. The regulations read out before the strike – which established, among other things, what counts as a weapon, that the wearing of political uniforms is forbidden, and that traffic can be blocked for three minutes maximum -– made it seem like it’s a familiar, almost institutionalized form of furthering public discussion.

The push-and-pull between students’ near-utopian demands and the Economic Miracle generation’s resentment of those demands shed light on one of the challenges facing the 60-year-old federal German social state: the tension between providing for the populace and enabling the populace to get too comfortable with being taken care of.

Towards the end of the rally, a girl at the podium talked about how she should be able to decide what she learns and when she learns it, and that everyone should be able to go at their own pace. A middle-aged woman with a blonde beehive hairdo looked on skeptically from the cash register of her flower stand, muttering “Sure, sure. We’ll never get there.” She turned to the kids crowding her stand and shooed them away, telling them some of us are working here.

Photo Dan Antonaccio

6.17.2009

Bildungsstreik for beginners

American-Canadian perspectives on Germany's educational strike movement, PART I

Braden Goyette

Today is meant to be the high-point of Germany's 2009 student strike - at universities and secondary schools all over the country, walk-outs and other actions have been planned to draw attention to the state of the German educational system and call for reforms.

A sizeable crowd gathered on the campus of Jena's Friedrich Schiller Universitaet (FSU) despite the rain Monday to kick off the “week of action”, drawn by the live rock music booming out over the square and the exhuberant words of a faculty lecturer in favor of the students' protest. The rhetoric was high-flying - phrases like "cracking the whip" and "eliminate bureaucracy" were thrown around, with complaints about the number of tests students have to take and increasing pressure to perform. A glib comparison of the current educational system to the situation during GDR-times even made its way into one speech, something that can't but seem contradictory when the strike is positioning itself against the commercialization of knowledge and influence of neoliberal deregulation on the educational system.

For Americans, coming from a country where paying $40,000+ a year and getting into massive amounts of debt to go to school has become the norm, the demands of the German student movement can sometimes be hard to take seriously. Here, the norm is that students don’t pay tuition - though some schools are starting to introduce fees of 500 Euros a semester.

But according to Jan Latza, member of the strike's Berlin Technical University-based national press team, tuition fees aren't even the primary impetus for this year's week-long protest. The three-tiered school system, which sorts children into vocational and college-bound tracks early in life and, the protesters contend, systematically disadvantages children from immigrant and working-class families, has long been the cause of protest among younger students.

“There have been protests at the secondary schools for years already,” Latza explained. “Last year there were about 100,000 students out on the streets, and at a certain point there was this big discrepancy – the high-schoolers were in the streets and the university students, who’d already been seeing massive re-structuring in the system for years, were doing relatively little outside of the struggle against tuition fees.”

The introduction of Bachelors and Masters‘ programs as part of the Bologna Process - a series of accords between European countries made in the hopes of streamlining education in different member nations and giving students more mobility within the EU - provided another impetus for university and high school students to combine their efforts.

Previously, students could pursue a Diplom or Magister, programs that involved a longer study time. Now with the Bachelors and Masters programs, there’s another round where students can be sorted out of the system, Latza argued, with significantly fewer places in Masters programs and fewer opportunities for students to get the same depth of education that they could in the old system. “There’s a clear connection with the debate being raised by the high school students, that this social sorting-out process […] and the exclusion that essentially begins in kindergarten and continues into university has to stop.”

At the FSU pre-strike concert, both speakers on stage and students in the crowd further cited the six-semester period for completing a Bachelors as far too short for substantial learning to take place, and called for an eight-semester minimum for completing the degree. Roland, a FSU alum who recently completed a Diplom in biology and now holds a research job in the surrounding area, said that he doesn't support the Bachelors-Masters system in the sciences. In addition to the limitations of the short study period, degrees from different universities aren’t really seen as equivalent, he explained, taking as an example that equivalent degrees from Jena and Munich will not be weighed equally. This in effect limits students’ mobility, he continued, and until universities are better connected with one another, one of the main original goals of the Bologna process isn’t being achieved.

As a foreigner watching these events unfold, what struck me most was the high level of nation-wide organizing and coordination that went into this protest week: from the nationwide assemblies leading up to this protest, to the unified aesthetic of posters and fliers in cities all over the country, to the close cooperation with big labour and educators’ unions like Ver.di and the Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft.

It also struck me was just how foreign the idea of students striking was from an American perspective. Why does it then seem to be the case that the lower the tuition fees, the stronger the culture of protest? Is it because, growing up with such extensive social programs provided by the state as the norm, young people feel more entitled and empowered to ask for more?

Some students at the FSU were more skeptical about this week’s protest, and expressed doubts as to whether it would have any effect whatsoever. “I would say there’s a small percent… roughly 15 or 20 percent who believe that these actions will actually change something. But the majority doesn’t believe in it,” said Daniel, a 5th semester history and sociology bachelors student at the FSU.

It seems to be a difficult balance between involving everyone and presenting clear demands, and the students I spoke to at the Jena pre-strike party felt that the movement tries to take on too much at once, rather than laying out clear, focused goals.

It remains to be seen, throughout the course of the day, how great a portion of German students care about these issues, and whether government and university administrations will take notice of their demands. But for the movement’s flaws and high demands, I can’t help but think we could use some more of this kind of spirit back home – that in some respects, their educational strike could take us to school.

Photo Dan Antonaccio

Blog Archive